In a primarily methodological investigation of weak instrument bias, Davies et al.29 (link) considered the causal effect of height (standardized) on lung function (measured as forced vital capacity, FVC, measured in ml) using 180 genetic variants as IVs with data on 3631 participants from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) cohort.30 (link) These variants were originally identified in a genome-wide association study.31 (link) The associations of the variants with height and with FVC are displayed in a scatter plot in Figure 3 (left). The slope of the line through the scatter plot is the IVW causal effect estimate using all the variants as IVs of 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 0.67]. This is similar to the TSLS estimate of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.68) reported by Davies et al. The causal estimates represent the increase in FVC for a 1 standard deviation increase in height.
Figure 3 (right) shows a funnel plot of the MAF-corrected genetic associations with the exposure against the individual causal effect estimates for each variant. A visual inspection of the funnel plot suggests that there is little asymmetry present. Applying MR-Egger regression with MAF-corrected weights to the summarized data yields an intercept estimate -0.0009 with an associated P-value of 0.75. The bias-adjusted causal effect estimate from MR-Egger regression is 0.60 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.75), a slight increase in magnitude and uncertainty compared with the IVW and TSLS estimates. There was also no apparent heterogeneity in the IV estimates from each genetic variant individually, as evidenced by Cochran’s Q test (P = 0.99). In the Web Appendix (available as Supplementary data at IJE online) we show how the IVW and MR-Egger regression methods were implemented on these data with just a single line of computer code (using R and Stata). In summary, there is no evidence that directional pleiotropy is an important factor for these data.
Free full text: Click here