This is a retrospective, single-center, observational study evaluating patients diagnosed with unruptured intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms treated with an FD stent between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2020, at the Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander–Clínica Ardila Lülle. We analyzed and anonymized patient information that may identify a patient from clinical records, medical consultations, and follow-up imaging records of the patients enrolled. Patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of unruptured small (<5 mm), medium (5–10 mm), large (10–25 mm), or giant (>25 mm) aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid segment treated with FDs in that period were included. In addition, 1-year digital subtraction angiography (DSA) results were mandatory to assess the occlusion rate. Incomplete data in the database, patients with no follow-up, and a history of aneurysm rupture less than 30 days before treatment were excluded.
Protocol detail
Unruptured ICA Aneurysms Treated with FD Stents
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Foscal Hospital, University of Pamplona, Autonomous University of Bucaramanga
Top 5 similar protocols
Variable analysis
independent variables
- Treatment with FD stent for unruptured intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms
- Occlusion rate of the aneurysms at 1-year follow-up based on digital subtraction angiography (DSA)
- Patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of unruptured small (<5 mm), medium (5–10 mm), large (10–25 mm), or giant (>25 mm) aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid segment treated with FDs
- Exclusion of patients with incomplete data in the database, no follow-up, and a history of aneurysm rupture less than 30 days before treatment
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the input protocol.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!