The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system (FAERS) is an SRS and the largest and best-known database worldwide. The regulatory authority in Japan, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), controls the SRS of the JADER database. Adverse events recorded in the FAERS database from January 2004 to June 2014 were downloaded from the FDA website (http://www.fda.gov). Relevant information from the JADER database from April 2004 to November 2016 was downloaded from the PMDA website (http://www.pmda.go.jp). We constructed a database that integrated each FAERS and JADER dataset using the FileMaker Pro 13 (FileMaker Inc.). For duplicate entries, we followed the FDA recommendation (http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance/AdverseDrugEffects), and adopted the most recent case number to identify duplicate patient reports and excluded them from the analysis. We analyzed four immunosuppressants (CsA, everolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil), four calcium channel blockers (amlodipine, benidipine, nicardipine and nifedipine), and 11 anticonvulsants (carbamazepine, clobazam, diazepam, gabapentin, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, topiramate, valproic acid, and zonisamide). For drug definitions, we used both the general and brand names based on the DrugBank 3.0 and 4.0 (Table 1). Drugs in the FAERS were classified into four categories: Primary Suspect drug (PS), Secondary Suspect drug (SS), Concomitant (C), and Interacting (I); according to their anticipated degree of involvement in adverse events. The analysis was restricted to reports where drugs were recorded as PS and SS in the FAERS database. In the “drug information” table of the JADER database, each drug was assigned a code according to its association with adverse drug reactions: “suspected drug,” “concomitant drug,” or “interacting drug.” The analysis was restricted to reports where drugs were recorded as “suspected drugs” in the JADER database.
Brand names of drugs
Generic namea
Number of brand name
Brand name
Immunosuppressants
Cyclosporine
6
Gengraf, Neoral, etc.
Everolimus
1
Certican
Sirolimus
1
Rapamune
Mycophenolate mofetil
2
Cellcept, Mucoloc
Calcium Channel Blockers
Amlodipine
7
Amlocard, Amlodis, etc.
Benidipineb
-
-
Nicardipine
3
Cardene, Cardene IV, etc.
Nifedipine
106
Adalat, Adalat 10, etc.
Anticonvulsants
Carbamazepine
29
Apo-Carbamazepine, Atretol, etc.
Clobazam
6
Chlorepin, Clorepin, etc.
Diazepam
116
Alboral, Aliseum, etc.
Gabapentin
3
Aclonium, Neurontin, etc.
Levetiracetam
1
Keppra
Phenobarbital
138
Adonal, Aephenal, etc.
Phenytoin
130
Aleviatin, Antisacer, etc.
Primidone
36
Apo-Primidone, Cyral, etc.
Topiramate
2
Topamax, Topamax Sprinkle, etc.
Valproic acid
25
Alti-Valproic, Avugane, etc.
Zonisamide
4
Excegran, Exegram, etc.
a Generic name and brand name were used in this analysis b Benidipine exists only generic name
Hatahira H., Abe J., Hane Y., Matsui T., Sasaoka S., Motooka Y., Hasegawa S., Fukuda A., Naganuma M., Ohmori T., Kinosada Y, & Nakamura M. (2017). Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia: a retrospective study using spontaneous reporting system databases. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, 3, 19.
Adverse events recorded in the FAERS database from January 2004 to June 2014
Relevant information from the JADER database from April 2004 to November 2016
control variables
None explicitly mentioned
controls
Positive control: None mentioned
Negative control: None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required