To shift research, practice, and policies to a focus on health, the PLUS Consortium identified two initial tasks that it pursued in parallel. First, the Consortium drafted a definition of bladder health.44 Consistent with the World Health Organization’s definition of health,45 the PLUS Consortium conceptualizes bladder health as “a complete state of physical, mental and social well-being related to bladder function, and not merely the absence of LUTS,” with function that “permits daily activities, adapts to short term physical or environmental stressors, and allows optimal well-being (e.g., travel, exercise, social, occupational or other activities).” Second, the Consortium adopted a prevention science paradigm and developed a conceptual framework to guide the Consortium’s initial prevention research agenda. The Consortium began this task by establishing a shared understanding of prevention science among its diverse members. The Consortium then drew from separate, but complementary theoretical traditions and contemporary writings to develop the PLUS conceptual framework. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the PLUS approach in developing a conceptual framework to guide the Consortium’s initial prevention research agenda.
Expanding Bladder Health Research and Prevention
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of Minnesota
Other organizations : National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Minnesota Medical Center, University of California, San Diego, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Rush University, Howard Brown Health Center, University of Illinois Chicago, Yale New Haven Health System, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Protocol cited in 17 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Prevention focus beyond detection and treatment of LUTS
- Promotion and preservation of bladder health
- Prevention of LUTS in girls and women
- Research, practice, and policies related to bladder health and LUTS prevention
- Control variables not explicitly mentioned.
- Positive control: None mentioned.
- Negative control: None mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!