The Xpert® CT/NG assay (from here referred to as Xpert) is run on the GeneXpert® System and can be implemented in clinical settings without the need for central laboratory processing. That assay is run in approximately 90 minutes and results are displayed in tabular and graphic formats on a computer system. The GeneXpert® System has three main internal quality control mechanisms to ensure ideal test functioning and conditions.18 One of those internal quality control mechanisms is the sample adequacy control (SAC), which detects the presence of the gene encoding hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS), a single-copy human cellular housekeeping gene, to monitor whether the sample contains human DNA. A negative SAC indicates that inadequate numbers of human cells were present in the sample, which can be due to sample degradation, insufficient mixing, or because of an inadequately collected specimen. The primers and probes in the Xpert CT/NG Assay detect chromosomal sequences in the CT and NG bacteria, with one target for CT and two different targets for NG. Both of the NG targets need to be positive for the Xpert CT/NG Assay to return a positive NG result. The testing methods occurred in accordance with the manufacturer directions. Xpert results were neither used for clinical management nor were communicated to the participants. Indeterminate Xpert test results were rerun once and those specimens that failed to show presence of human DNA or were incomplete pairs were excluded from analysis.
Comparative Evaluation of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Assays
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of California, San Diego
Protocol cited in 5 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Aptima Combo 2® assay (Aptima)
- Xpert® CT/NG assay (Xpert)
- Results from the Aptima test
- Results from the Xpert test
- Sample adequacy control (SAC) in Xpert CT/NG Assay
- Testing methods occurred in accordance with the manufacturer directions
- Laboratory staff that performed the Aptima test were not aware of symptom status or results from the comparator test
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!