Exploring Neonatologists' Moral Distress

An interview guide was developed based on a review of the relevant literature [1 –3 (link), 6 (link)–10 (link), 13 (link), 15 (link)–18 (link)]. To obtain a deep and comprehensive understanding of the concepts under investigation (neonatologists’ moral distress), the interviews covered a number of topics intended to capture a wide range of the participants’ lived experiences. Below, we specify a few questions that were included in the interview guide:

1) If you have ever face the question of whether the treatment you provided or recommended was the right one, how did you respond to these situations? Why did you respond as you did?

2) Please describe to me in detail any significant difficulties you encountered in making a clear judgement regarding what course of action should be taken.

a) Please describe to me in detail real past case(s) (if any) in which you felt constrained from acting on what you knew to be right. Please describe to me in detail your related experiences.

Free full text: Click here

Deligianni M., Voultsos P., Tzitiridou-Chatzopoulou M.K., Drosou-Agakidou V, & Tarlatzis V. (2023). Moral distress among neonatologists working in neonatal intensive care units in Greece: a qualitative study. BMC Pediatrics, 23, 114.

Publication 2023

Face Felt Neonatologists

Corresponding Organization : Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Other organizations : University of Western Macedonia

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Not explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

Neonatologists' moral distress

control variables

Not explicitly mentioned

controls

No positive or negative controls specified by the authors.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!