Primary CRC Radical Surgery Outcomes

A total of 394 patients with primary CRC, who underwent radical operation between 2013 and 2015 at Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People’s Republic of China) were included in this study. All patients were at stages I, II, or III according to the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification system. Patients who died perioperatively or with secondary malignancy and those with distant metastases such as liver or lung before the operation were excluded. Histology specimens were evaluated by two senior pathologists, and the diagnosis of CRC with or without NED was confirmed in all patients. This study was approved by the local ethics committee of Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute.

Free full text: Click here

Chen Y., Liang Y., Cao L., Dong X, & Sun D. (2023). Neuroendocrine differentiation: a risk fellow in colorectal cancer. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 21, 89.

Publication 2023

Cancer Diagnosis Hospital ethics committee Liver Metastases Operation lung Pathologists Patients

Corresponding Organization : China Medical University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

dependent variables

Diagnosis of CRC with or without NED

control variables

Patients were at stages I, II, or III according to the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification system
Patients who died perioperatively or with secondary malignancy and those with distant metastases such as liver or lung before the operation were excluded

controls

Positive control: Histology specimens were evaluated by two senior pathologists
Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!