Data was searched at 100 ppm peptide mass tolerance to evaluate the mass accuracy of the data set. After a correction25 (link) of a systematic mass deviation of 3 ppm, 90% and 99% of all PSMs with a Mascot score greater than 30 fell within a ±5 and ±20 ppm mass window, respectively. For the most stringent mass tolerance settings where Mascot thresholds are most sensitive, the data was searched at 20 ppm. Moreover, data was also searched at 500 ppm peptide mass tolerance to enable mass accuracy filtering combined with the adjusted MHT (Adjusted Mascot Threshold, AMT25 (link)). The mass deviation filter was set to 5 ppm, which was shown to be the most effective filter setting in combination with the AMT (Supporting Information
Peptide Identification and Mass Accuracy Evaluation
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Wellcome Sanger Institute
Protocol cited in 83 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Enzyme
- Maximum missed cleavages
- Variable modifications
- Product mass tolerance
- Protein sequence database
- Decoy database generation method
- Peptide mass tolerance for evaluating mass accuracy
- Mass deviation filter for mass accuracy filtering
- Mascot search results
- Peptide-Spectrum Matches (PSMs) with Mascot score greater than 30
- Percentage of PSMs within mass accuracy windows
- Trypsin (allowing for cleavage before proline)
- Carbamidomethylation of cysteine
- Oxidation of methionine
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!