Expert panel members used a standardized template (Supplementary Figure 1, available in the online version of this article at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/76509746/home) to submit 3–5 real-life case scenarios representing patients with early (within 1 year of symptom onset) undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis. These scenarios included all patient information that the experts considered relevant to rule in (positive factors) or out (negative factors) an eventual diagnosis of RA. Each scenario captured the following patient elements: age and sex, duration of joint pain, duration of joint swelling, average duration of morning stiffness, and distribution of affected joints (swollen and tender joints, indicated on joint homunculi). The expert also provided information on the subsequent disease course, whether or not treatment with methotrexate (MTX) had been initiated at that assessment time point, and the expert’s opinion, using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (very low probability) to 5 (very high probability), of the probability that the patient would, if untreated, “develop RA.” Each completed case scenario was assigned a unique name. Two members of the steering committee (TN and GH) selected a subset of 30 case scenarios that best represented the spectrum of probability of RA development. Most of the cases were in the middle 3 probability categories. These 30 scenarios were then simplified and standardized. The submitting expert’s identity, opinion regarding the probability of RA, and information on the subsequent disease course were removed.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Neogi T., Aletaha D., Silman A.J., Naden R.L., Felson D.T., Aggarwal R., Bingham CO I.I.I., Birnbaum N.S., Burmester G.R., Bykerk V.P., Cohen M.D., Combe B., Costenbader K.H., Dougados M., Emery P., Ferraccioli G., Hazes J.M., Hobbs K., Huizinga T.W., Kavanaugh A., Kay J., Khanna D., Kvien T.K., Laing T., Liao K., Mease P., Ménard H.A., Moreland L.W., Nair R., Pincus T., Ringold S., Smolen J.S., Stanislawska-Biernat E., Symmons D., Tak P.P., Upchurch K.S., Vencovský J., Wolfe F, & Hawker G. (2010). The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Phase 2 Methodological Report. Arthritis and rheumatism, 62(9), 2582-2591.
Other organizations :
Medical University of Vienna, Johns Hopkins University, University of California, San Francisco, California Pacific Medical Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, National Jewish Health, University of Colorado Denver, Université Paris Cité, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Délégation Paris 5, University of Leeds, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Erasmus MC, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital, Seattle Children's Hospital, Institute of Cardiology, University of Manchester, University of Amsterdam, Institute of Rheumatology, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Kansas
Distribution of affected joints (swollen and tender joints, indicated on joint homunculi)
Whether or not treatment with methotrexate (MTX) had been initiated at that assessment time point
dependent variables
The expert's opinion, using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (very low probability) to 5 (very high probability), of the probability that the patient would, if untreated, 'develop RA'
control variables
The subsequent disease course
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required