The PlaComOv study is a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled superiority trial. The acronym “PlaComOv” already reveals the study aim: “Will the use of the PLAsmaJet® device improve the rate of COMplete cytoreductive surgery for advanced-stage OVarian cancer.”17 (link)This trial compared the rates of complete CRS of patients with advanced EOC operated with standard use of electrocoagulation (control group) versus patients operated with adjuvant use of PlasmaJet (intervention group). Patients from four gynecological oncology centers and nine centers specialized in ovarian cancer surgery in the Netherlands were randomized to either treatment arm. All hospitals had experience in CRS. A gyneco-oncologist from one of the oncology centers was always one of the surgeons. All surgeons were trained to perform operations with the PlasmaJet by following a course where theoretical knowledge of the PlasmaJet was discussed in detail, followed by operations on laboratory animals, concluding with an exam. During the cytoreductive surgery, someone with experience with PlasmaJet was always present. For practical reasons, randomization was performed prior to surgery. Block randomization in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or control group was performed, with stratification according to suspected versus proven advanced-stage EOC, primary CRS (pCRS) versus interval CRS (iCRS), presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedure. All patients provided written informed consent and were blinded to the arm for which they were selected.
Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer G.M., Hofhuis W., Reesink-Peters N., Willemsen S., Boere I.A., Schoots I.G., Piek J.M., Hofman L.N., Beltman J.J., van Driel W.J., Werner H.M., Baalbergen A., van Haaften-de Jong A.M., Dorman M., Haans L., Nedelcu I., Ewing-Graham P.C, & van Beekhuizen H.J. (2022). Adjuvant Use of PlasmaJet Device During Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: Results of the PlaComOv-study, a Randomized Controlled Trial in The Netherlands. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 29(8), 4833-4843.
Other organizations :
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Haga Hospital, Bravis Ziekenhuis, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
Use of PlasmaJet device (intervention group) vs. standard use of electrocoagulation (control group)
dependent variables
Rate of complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for advanced-stage ovarian cancer
control variables
All hospitals had experience in CRS
A gyneco-oncologist from one of the oncology centers was always one of the surgeons
All surgeons were trained to perform operations with the PlasmaJet
Someone with experience with PlasmaJet was always present during the cytoreductive surgery
Randomization was performed prior to surgery with block randomization in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by suspected versus proven advanced-stage EOC, primary CRS (pCRS) versus interval CRS (iCRS), presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedure
All patients provided written informed consent and were blinded to the arm for which they were selected
positive controls
Not specified
negative controls
Not specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required