Patient-Reported Outcomes Monitoring App

The app that was used by the participants to report the ePROs in both trials has been described elsewhere [8 (link), 16 (link)]. In brief, the app sent out a weekly notification to complete a modified Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (mMDHAQ) that included the routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3) questionnaire in the app. Results were displayed in graphs over time to provide insight into disease activity over time. In addition, participants could access their medical data (lab results) in the app and in an information tab information was provided regarding rheumatic diseases and on the interpretation of the RAPID3.

Free full text: Click here

Seppen B.F., Wiegel J., Nurmohamed M.T., Bos W.H, & ter Wee M.M. (2023). Facilitators and barriers to adhere to monitoring disease activity with ePROs: a focus group study in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Rheumatology International, 43(4), 677-685.

Publication 2023

Patient Rheumatic diseases

Corresponding Organization : Reade

Other organizations : Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

None explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

Disease activity over time

control variables

None explicitly mentioned

controls

Positive controls: None mentioned
Negative controls: None mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!