We used the signed rank and the exact McNemar’s test to compare pretest/posttest information. We further examined the effect of the DA on screening decisions among older women stratifying by life expectancy (≤9 vs. >9 year life expectancy).31 (link)We examined whether the acceptability of the DA differed by educational attainment using bivariable statistics. We aimed to recruit 42 patients to detect a moderate effect size (0.6 times the estimated standard deviation) of the DA on patient knowledge and decisional conflict assuming within-patient correlation of 0.1. We performed a complete case analysis. All analyses were completed using SAS statistical software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Protocol detail
Comparing Screening Decisions in Older Women
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Patient
Women
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Top 5 similar protocols
Variable analysis
independent variables
- Decision aid (DA)
- Screening decisions among older women
- Acceptability of the DA
- Life expectancy (≤9 vs. >9 year life expectancy)
- Educational attainment
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!