Talazoparib vs. Physician's Choice Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer
The EMBRACA study was an open-label, randomized, international phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of talazoparib to protocol-specified physician’s choice of single agent therapy (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) using a 2:1 randomization in patients with advanced breast cancer (Supplemental Figure S1). Patients were centrally randomized with stratification by number of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease (0 vs. 1 to 3), receptor status (triple-negative vs. hormone receptor–positive), and a history of CNS metastases (yes vs. no). Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer were not eligible for this trial. The treatment arm consisted of talazoparib 1 mg orally once daily continuously in the fed or fasting state. Laboratory studies were monitored every 3 weeks with dose hold and dose reductions as outlined in the supplement. The control arm was protocol-specified chemotherapy (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) in accordance with the institution’s dose and regimen guidelines in 21-day cycles. The choice of drug was determined before randomization for each patient. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or physician decision. Cross-over from the control arm to the experimental arm was not permitted. The study sponsor designed the protocol in collaboration with the authors. Local site investigators collected the data, which were analyzed by the sponsor. All authors had full access to study data after the primary analysis was conducted. The authors vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the data and for adherence of trial conduct to the study protocol (available at NEJM.org). Editorial and medical writing support funded by Pfizer Inc. were provided by Edwin Thrower, PhD, Mary Kacillas, and Paula Stuckart of Ashfield Healthcare Communications.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Litton J.K., Rugo H.S., Ettl J., Hurvitz S.A., Gonçalves A., Lee K.H., Fehrenbacher L., Yerushalmi R., Mina L.A., Martin M., Roché H., Im Y.H., Quek R.G., Markova D., Tudor I.C., Hannah A.L., Eiermann W, & Blum J.L. (2018). “Talazoparib for Advanced Germline BRCA-mutated Breast Cancer”. The New England journal of medicine, 379(8), 753-763.
Publication 2018
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, University of California, Los Angeles, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Seoul National University Hospital, Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center, Rabin Medical Center, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, GEICAM – Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Institut Claudius Regaud, Samsung Medical Center, Pfizer (United States), The US Oncology Network, Texas Oncology
Talazoparib 1 mg orally once daily continuously in the fed or fasting state
dependent variables
Efficacy
Safety
control variables
Protocol-specified physician's choice of single agent therapy (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine)
Number of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease (0 vs. 1 to 3)
Receptor status (triple-negative vs. hormone receptor-positive)
History of CNS metastases (yes vs. no)
controls
Positive control: Protocol-specified physician's choice of single agent therapy (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine)
Negative control: Not applicable, as this is an open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial with no placebo control
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required