Participant interviews were uploaded and coded in NVivo 13. Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six step approach was used to guide the thematic analysis. This included reading and re-reading the interview transcripts to build familiarity with the data, noting preliminary interpretations relevant to the research question, what are service provider’s and stakeholder’s perspectives about the challenges and strategies for assisting men with their intimate partner relationships? A coding schedule was developed to fracture the data using 10 descriptive labels including, “how men access services,” “advocacy issues,” “barriers to access,” “masculinities,” “program characteristics,” and “skills men need.” Data segments were assigned to these codes, and the data in each code were read and compared to distill patterns and account for variations. Through this process, we recognized participants’ use of social constructivist and relational approaches to the delivery of services. As such, Connell’s (2005) masculinities framework was used to further conceptualize and theorize the findings. Connell’s (2005) masculinities comprises a plurality of gendered identities, roles, and relations to make available diversity for how men think and act within socially constructed norms for what it is to be a man (Connell, 2005 ). Examining participants’ interviews with this framework allowed us to examine their perceptions of power, social structures, and agency in men’s intimate partner relationships, and what that means for tailored services. In completing these analyses for each code, we subsumed codes (e.g., “advocacy issues” and “barriers to access”) to differentiate and inductively derive three thematic findings.