Each image was inspected with an optical microscope (Axostar Plus equipped with Axio-Cam MRc, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The histological results were shown at 10× (100 μm of the Bar scale). The degree of paw damage was evaluated according to a six-point score: 0 = no inflammation, 1 = mild inflammation, 2 = mild/moderate inflammation, 3 = moderate inflammation, 4 = moderate/severe inflammation and 5 = severe inflammation as reported by Petrosino et al. [20 (link)].
Histological Evaluation of Muscle Inflammation
Each image was inspected with an optical microscope (Axostar Plus equipped with Axio-Cam MRc, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The histological results were shown at 10× (100 μm of the Bar scale). The degree of paw damage was evaluated according to a six-point score: 0 = no inflammation, 1 = mild inflammation, 2 = mild/moderate inflammation, 3 = moderate inflammation, 4 = moderate/severe inflammation and 5 = severe inflammation as reported by Petrosino et al. [20 (link)].
Corresponding Organization : University of Messina
Other organizations : Sapienza University of Rome
Protocol cited in 1 other protocol
Variable analysis
- Treatment with the extract
- Degree of paw damage (evaluated according to a six-point score)
- Local inflammatory response
- Structural tissue changes of the muscle fibers
- Activity of the extract
- Sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
- Optical microscope (Axostar Plus equipped with Axio-Cam MRc, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany)
- Histological estimations made as previously described [19]
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!