Retrospective Analysis of Thoracic ESCC

A retrospective analysis was performed on thoracic ESCC patients who received surgery in Tangdu Hospital affiliated to Fourth Military Medical University from April 2019 to December 2020. The 8th version of American Joint Committee on Cancer was used for preoperative and postoperative staging of the patients.^{[11 (link)]} Inclusion criteria as follows: Thoracic ESCC received Mckeown resection; Lymph node dissection ≥ 2.0 field; Preoperative albumin-binding paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin chemotherapy for 2 to 3 cycles, and; Postoperative TRG analysis was performed.

Free full text: Click here

Chen J., Zhu J., Zhang Y., Wang W., Xia Y., Zhao J, & Jiang T. (2023). Efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin in neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-center retrospective observational study. Medicine, 102(9), e33157.

Publication 2023

Albumin binding paclitaxel Cancer Combined chemotherapy Joint Lymph node dissection Military Nedaplatin Patients Surgery

Corresponding Organization :

Other organizations : Weatherford College, Air Force Medical University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Preoperative albumin-binding paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin chemotherapy for 2 to 3 cycles

dependent variables

Postoperative TRG analysis

control variables

Thoracic ESCC received Mckeown resection
Lymph node dissection ≥ 2.0 field
Preoperative and postoperative staging of the patients using the 8th version of American Joint Committee on Cancer

controls

No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the input.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!