The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Protocol detail

Comparing Acupuncture and Tactile Sensations

The subjects were blinded to the procedures and could not see the sites undergoing stimulation from their supine position in the scanner. They were told that the acupuncture performed at different acupoints with different techniques would generate different needling sensations. Tactile (touch) stimulation was performed prior to acupuncture when the subjects were still naïve to acupuncture as a sensory comparison for the acupuncture stimulation. Thus, the comparison stimulation also took into account expectation and its placebo effects. Tactile stimulation and acupuncture were both performed at the same acupoint in 16 subjects each for LI4 and ST36, and 13 subjects for LV3. Three of the 42 subjects received tactile stimulation and acupuncture at all three acupoints; the remaining 39 subjects received acupuncture to all three acupoints, but only the paired tactile stimulation to the first of their acupoints. Analyses comparing tactile stimulation to acupuncture stimulation were performed on the paired sensory – acupuncture datasets. Data from all 3 acupoints for each subject was used in the Spearman's correlation of intensities of sensations in acupuncture.
Acupuncture and tactile stimulation control was delivered to LI4 on the hand, LV3 on the foot and ST36 on the lower leg on the right in randomized order by an acupuncturist with over 25 years of clinical experience (JL). The individual's sensitivity to needle manipulation was pretested, aiming to elicit deqi sensations without noxious pain. The stimulation paradigm is depicted in Figure 1. The needle was rotated approximately 180° in each direction with even motion at the rate of 60 times/min for 2 min during M1 and M2. The needle remained in place during the rest periods R1, R2 and R3. Each procedure lasted a total of ten minutes. In order to avoid excess discomfort, the subject was instructed to raise one finger if any sensation reached the intensity of 7–8 on a scale of 1–10 and 2 fingers in case of any sharp pain. When so signalled, the acupuncturist would adjust the force of stimulation so that the sharp pain would disappear within a few seconds. The acupuncture stimulation procedure was performed twice for each acupoint. Sterile, one-time use only stainless steel needles were used for LV3 (0.20 mm diameter) and ST36 (0.22 mm diameter) (KINGLI Medical Appliance Co. Wuxi, China). Silver needles (0.23 mm diameter) were used for LI4 (Matsuka, Tokyo, Japan). Superficial tactile stimulation was performed by gentle tapping with a size 5.88 von Frey monofilament, a standard method of sensory stimulation, prior to acupuncture with needling. The purpose of this design was to explore how acupuncture sensations might differ from the sensations elicited by the conventional sensory stimulus of touch. At the end of each tactile stimulation or acupuncture procedure, the subject was questioned by another researcher in the team if each of the deqi sensations (aching, pressure, soreness, heaviness, fullness, warmth, cooling, numbness, tingling, dull pain), sharp pain or any other sensations occurred during the stimulation, and to rate its intensity on the scale of 1–10 (1–3 mild, 4–6 moderate, 7–9 strong, 10 unbearable).
Free full text: Click here
Publication 2007
Acupoint Acupuncture procedure Fingers Foot Lower leg Pain Pain sensations Pressure Seconds Sensitivity Silver Stainless steel Sterile Touch

Corresponding Organization : Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging

Other organizations : Morpho (United States)

Protocol cited in 15 other protocols

1

SARS-CoV-2 Variant S-Protein Antigen Constructs

The S-protein antigen constructs representing the different VOCs contained the following mutations compared to the WT variant (Wuhan Hu-1; GenBank: MN908947.3): deletion (Δ) of H69, V70 and Y144, N501Y, A570D, D614G, P681H, T716I, S982A, and D1118H in Alpha (B.1.1.7); L18F, D80A, D215G, L242H, R246I, K417N, E484K, N501Y, D614G, and A701V in Beta (B.1.351); and L18F, T20N, P26S, D138Y, R190S, K417T, E484K, N501Y, D614G, H655Y, and T1027I in Gamma(P.1). The genes were ordered as gBlock gene fragments (Integrated DNA Technologies) and cloned Pst I/Not I in a pPPI4 expression vector containing a hexahistidine (his) tag with Gibson Assembly (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All S constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing and the protein was subsequently produced in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 F cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and purified as previously described4 (link),9 (link).
+ Open protocol
2

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Variant Expression

The mutations compared to the WT variant (Wuhan Hu-1; GenBank: MN908947.3) in the S proteins are depicted in S1 Table. The S constructs were ordered as gBlock gene fragments (Integrated DNA Technologies) and cloned in a pPPI4 expression vector containing a hexahistidine (his) tag with Gibson Assembly (ThermoFisher) [32 (link)]. All S constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing, subsequently produced in HEK293F cells (ThermoFisher), and purified as previously described [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
3

Structural Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variants

The 2P-stabilized S proteins
of the Wuhan strain (WT) and B.1.351
variant were described previously.12 (link),55 (link) The B.1.351
construct contained the following mutations compared to the WT variant
(Wuhan Hu-1; GenBank: MN908947.3): L18F, D80A, D215G, L242H, R246I,
K417N, E484K, N501Y, D614G, and A701V. Both S constructs were produced
in HEK293F suspension cells (ThermoFisher) and purified as previously
described.12 (link) For the human ACE2 receptor,
soluble ACE2 was generated as described previously12 (link) by using a gene encoding amino acids 18–740 of ACE2.
The IgGs and Fab fragments used in this study were produced as previously
described.12 (link),26 (link)
+ Open protocol

Variable analysis

independent variables
  • Acupuncture stimulation
  • Tactile (touch) stimulation
dependent variables
  • Intensity of sensations experienced by subjects (aching, pressure, soreness, heaviness, fullness, warmth, cooling, numbness, tingling, dull pain, sharp pain)
control variables
  • Acupoints (LI4, LV3, ST36)
  • Needle characteristics (diameter, material)
  • Acupuncture stimulation technique (rotation, rate, duration)
  • Subject instructions (to signal when sensation reaches intensity of 7-8 or sharp pain)
  • Acupuncturist with over 25 years of clinical experience
positive controls
  • Tactile stimulation as a sensory comparison for acupuncture stimulation
negative controls
  • Not mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!