X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K at either the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL; BL11-1) or the Canadian Light Source (CLS; 08ID-1). Fluorescence scans were taken on P-gp–cyclopeptide co-crystals to maximize the anomalous signal contribution from the incorporated selenium (Table 1 ▶). All diffraction data were processed with MOSFLM (Battye et al., 2011 ▶ ) and reduced with SCALA (Evans, 2006 ▶ ) within the CCP4 suite of programs (Winn et al., 2011 ▶ ). In the case of QZ-Ala, the data from three isomorphous crystals were scaled together to maximize the completeness (Table 1 ▶). The 3.4 Å resolution structure of P-gp was initially solved by molecular replacement (MR) with Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007 ▶ ) using a previously determined P-gp structure (PDB entry 4ksc; Ward et al., 2013 ▶ ) as a search model with no modifications. Commensurate with the improved resolution, the new electron-density features guided adjustments of our model when compared with the same more ‘open’ crystal form that we reported in 2013 (Ward et al., 2013 ▶ ) and are summarized in Supplementary Fig. S2. Residues 30–32 were located in the electron density, and resulted in a subsequent shift in the registration of residues in the first helix (residues 30–43) preceding TM1. Amendments were made to the topology of intracellular helix 1 (IH1; residues 154–168), extracellular loop 3 (ECL3; residues 318–338) and a portion of TM6 leading into the first NBD (residues 358–387). Within NBD1, residues 398–404, 424–427, 520–526 and 597–602 were rebuilt. Elbow helix 2 (EH2) was rebuilt from residues 689 to 708. A registry issue was amended from ECL4 (residue 738) to TM8 (residue 760) and another that constitutes segments of TM9, ECL5 and the beginning of TM10 (residues 826–855). The topology of IH3 was adjusted (residues 795–806), as was ECL6 (residues 961–967) and a portion of TM12 (residues 972–984). Further modifications were made in the region leading into and contributing to NBD2 (residues 1010–1028, 1042–1047, 1129–1137 and 1165–1172). Residues 1272 and 1273 were also located in the electron-density maps at the C-terminus. As for all structures of P-gp determined to date, the ‘linker’ region (residues 627–688) was not located in the electron density. Many of the structural adjustments are in general agreement with the recent corrections (Li et al., 2014 ▶ ) made to the model of the more ‘closed’ conformation of P-gp first reported in 2009 (Aller et al., 2009 ▶ ). During the refinement process, the model underwent rigid-body and restrained positional refinement, with H atoms applied in their riding positions, using phenix.refine (Afonine et al., 2012 ▶ ) against a maximum-likelihood target function with grouped B factors, secondary-structure restraints, reference-model restraints and TLS. Rounds of refinement were interspersed with manual inspection and correction against σA-weighted electron-density maps in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010 ▶ ) and improvements to model geometry and stereochemistry were monitored using MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010 ▶ ). Subsequent cyclopeptide co-crystal structures were solved by either MR or rigid-body refinement using the refined 3.4 Å resolution model with residues from TM4 (218–243) and EH2 (689–694) removed to avoid biasing their placement within the electron-density maps. These structures were then refined in a similar fashion to the 3.4 Å resolution structure with an additional round of positional refinement with ligand B factors set to the Wilson B value. Ligand description dictionaries were determined using phenix.elbow (Adams et al., 2010 ▶ ) and the crystallographic positions of the incorporated seleniums were validated using anomalous scattering methods. The refined structures were judged to have excellent geometry as determined by MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010 ▶ ). The resulting refinement statistics are listed in Table 1 ▶.
Szewczyk P., Tao H., McGrath A.P., Villaluz M., Rees S.D., Lee S.C., Doshi R., Urbatsch I.L., Zhang Q, & Chang G. (2015). Snapshots of ligand entry, malleable binding and induced helical movement in P-glycoprotein. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 71(Pt 3), 732-741.
Publication 2015
B factors Body Crystallographic CyclopeptideElbow ElectronFluorescence Helix Intracellular LigandLight MapsRadiation Rigid ScansSelenium Structure gp X ray diffraction
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
University of California, San Diego, Scripps Research Institute, University of Montana, Texas Tech University, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
X-ray diffraction data were collected at either the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL; BL11-1) or the Canadian Light Source (CLS; 08ID-1)
Fluorescence scans were taken on P-gp–cyclopeptide co-crystals
dependent variables
Electron-density features guided adjustments of the P-gp model
Refinement statistics for the resulting structures
control variables
Experiments were conducted at 100 K
controls
The refined 3.4 Å resolution model with residues from TM4 (218–243) and EH2 (689–694) removed was used as a control to avoid biasing the placement of the cyclopeptides within the electron-density maps.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required