Insecticide Susceptibility Profiling of Mosquito Strains
Four strains of laboratory-reared mosquitoes were used in the experiments: the fully pyrethroid-susceptible Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) Ifakara strain; the pyrethroid-resistant (knock-down resistance; KDR) Anopheles gambiae s.s. Kisumu strain; the pyrethroid-resistant (metabolic resistance) Anopheles funestus FUMOZ strain; and the pyrethroid-susceptible Aedes aegypti Bagamoyo strain (Table 1). Colonies of these strains are maintained according to MR4 guidelines [24 ]. The larvae are fed on TetraMin fish flakes (Tetra, UK), and adults on 10% sugar ad libitum; females are membrane-fed cow’s blood for egg production. The colonies are maintained under approximately 12-h:12-h light:dark (natural light) at 27 ± 5 °C and 70 ± 30% relative humidity (RH).
Results of the World Health Organization susceptibility test for the laboratory-reared mosquitoes used in this experiment
Nulliparous 3–8 day-old mosquitoes were used for the experiments. Mosquitoes were selected by placing a hand near to their cage, and those that attempted to aggressively bite were aspirated into paper cups. When two mosquito strains of similar morphology were released simultaneously, red fluorescent pigment (Swada, Cheshire, UK) was used to mark the individuals of one of the strains so that the strains could be distinguished between. Mosquitoes were marked by dusting the mesh lid of the cup with a brush to create a cloud of pigment that was deposited onto the mosquitoes. After marking, the mosquitoes were aspirated into 10 × 10 × 10-cm release cages. The mosquitoes were transferred from the insectary to the SFS in a black cloth bag to prevent them from being damaged by the wind. Aedes mosquitoes were sugar starved for 12 h and Anopheles mosquitoes for 6 h prior to commencement of the experiments, to maximise their avidity without inducing excess mortality. Before each experiment, the mosquitoes were acclimatized for 45 min in the corridor of the SFS, which is separated from the experimental space by polyurethane sheeting to prevent the mosquitoes from coming into contact with the tested insecticides.
Tambwe M.M., Kibondo U.A., Odufuwa O.G., Moore J., Mpelepele A., Mashauri R., Saddler A, & Moore S.J. (2023). Human landing catches provide a useful measure of protective efficacy for the evaluation of volatile pyrethroid spatial repellents. Parasites & Vectors, 16, 90.
The four strains of laboratory-reared mosquitoes used in the experiments: Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) Ifakara strain, Anopheles gambiae s.s. Kisumu strain (knock-down resistance; KDR), Anopheles funestus FUMOZ strain (pyrethroid-resistant), and Aedes aegypti Bagamoyo strain (pyrethroid-susceptible)
dependent variables
24-h mortality for the mosquitoes exposed to different insecticides (permethrin, deltamethrin, alpha-cypermethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, bendiocarb, and pirimiphos methyl)
control variables
Age of mosquitoes (nulliparous 3-8 day-old mosquitoes used)
Starvation duration (Aedes mosquitoes starved for 12 h, Anopheles mosquitoes starved for 6 h)
Acclimatization duration (45 min in the corridor of the SFS before the experiments)
Environmental conditions (maintained at approximately 12-h:12-h light:dark, 27 ± 5 °C, and 70 ± 30% relative humidity)
positive controls
None explicitly mentioned
negative controls
None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required