Measuring Physiological Arousal in SBE

Heart rate (HR) is considered a valid tool for measuring physiological
arousal and has been used in a variety of studies to measure anxiety
during SBE experiences (7 (link), 8 (link)). In this study, participants
wore an HR monitor (Polar Team Pro with remote recording) throughout the
SBE experience. Participants were monitored throughout the SBE
experience for their resting HR and HR every 15 minutes
thereafter. Mean HR during the SBE was used during data analyses.

Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link: Access Free Full Text.

Cavaleri R., Withington A., Chalmers K.J, & Blackstock F. (2023). The Influence of Stress on Student Performance during Simulation-based Learning: A Pilot Randomized Trial. ATS Scholar, 4(4), 474-489.

Publication 2023

Team Pro

Corresponding Organization :

Other organizations : Western Sydney University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

None explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

Mean heart rate (HR) during the simulation-based experience (SBE)

control variables

Resting heart rate (HR)
Heart rate measured every 15 minutes during the SBE

controls

No positive or negative controls were mentioned in the provided information.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!