Due to the closeness of the body weights of all of the groups of rats, ventilatory data are shown without any corrections for body weight. The provided software (Fine Pointe, BUXCO) constantly corrected digitized values for changes in chamber temperature and humidity. Pressure changes associated with the respiratory waveforms were then converted to volumes (i.e., TV, PIF and PEF) using the algorithm of Epstein and colleagues28 (link)–30 (link). Specifically, factoring in chamber temperature and humidity, the cycle analyzers filtered the acquired signals, and BUXCO algorithms (Fine Pointe) generated an array of box flow data that identified a waveform segment as an acceptable breath. From that data vector, the minimum and maximum values were determined. Flows at this point were considered to be “box flow” signals. From this array, the minimum and maximum box flow values were determined and multiplied by a compensation factor provided by the selected algorithm50 (link),51 (link), thus producing TV, PIF and PEF values that were used to determine accepted and rejected waveforms, with rejected waveforms remaining below 5% throughout all phases of the protocols except for a transient rise in rejection of breaths to 15–20% for 1–2 min after injection of morphine (data not shown).
Respiratory Effects of Morphine and Cystine Compounds
Due to the closeness of the body weights of all of the groups of rats, ventilatory data are shown without any corrections for body weight. The provided software (Fine Pointe, BUXCO) constantly corrected digitized values for changes in chamber temperature and humidity. Pressure changes associated with the respiratory waveforms were then converted to volumes (i.e., TV, PIF and PEF) using the algorithm of Epstein and colleagues28 (link)–30 (link). Specifically, factoring in chamber temperature and humidity, the cycle analyzers filtered the acquired signals, and BUXCO algorithms (Fine Pointe) generated an array of box flow data that identified a waveform segment as an acceptable breath. From that data vector, the minimum and maximum values were determined. Flows at this point were considered to be “box flow” signals. From this array, the minimum and maximum box flow values were determined and multiplied by a compensation factor provided by the selected algorithm50 (link),51 (link), thus producing TV, PIF and PEF values that were used to determine accepted and rejected waveforms, with rejected waveforms remaining below 5% throughout all phases of the protocols except for a transient rise in rejection of breaths to 15–20% for 1–2 min after injection of morphine (data not shown).
Protocol cited in 12 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Injection of morphine (10 mg/kg, IV)
- Injection of vehicle (saline)
- Injection of d-cystine diEE (500 μmol/kg, IV)
- Injection of d-cystine (500 μmol/kg, IV)
- Injection of l-NACme (500 μmol/kg, IV)
- Ventilatory parameters recorded by whole body plethysmography
- Rats were placed in individual chambers and given 60 min to acclimatize to allow true resting ventilatory parameters to be established
- Due to the closeness of the body weights of all of the groups of rats, ventilatory data are shown without any corrections for body weight
- The provided software (Fine Pointe, BUXCO) constantly corrected digitized values for changes in chamber temperature and humidity
- Pressure changes associated with the respiratory waveforms were then converted to volumes (i.e., TV, PIF and PEF) using the algorithm of Epstein and colleagues
- Rejected waveforms remained below 5% throughout all phases of the protocols except for a transient rise in rejection of breaths to 15–20% for 1–2 min after injection of morphine
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!