Comparative Evaluation of Calcium Silicate Cements
Bio MTA+, MTA Cem, Biodentine and NeoMTA were tested in this study. The composition of the test materials and their manufacturers are provided in Table 1. Each material was mixed as per the instructions outlined by the manufacturer in a laminar flow cabin under aseptic conditions. Each mixture was then inserted into a custom-made presterilized teflon mold with a diameter of 8 mm and a thickness of 2.0 mm and left undisturbed for four hours. Fifteen sample discs for each group were obtained. Upon complete setting, the surfaces of the specimens were exposed to 30 min of ultraviolet light to ensure sterility [21 (link)]. All discs were immersed in 50 ml Falcon tubes filled with 25 ml of DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific 31,885,023, MA, USA) and stored in an incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. The extracts of the materials were filtered with 0.22-µm pore size filter (Sartorius AG, Germany). The stock extracts were kept at -20 °C until experiments.
Manufacturers and compositions of CSCs used in the study
Material type (Bio MTA+, MTA Cem, Biodentine, NeoMTA)
dependent variables
Not explicitly mentioned
control variables
Mixing procedure (per manufacturer instructions)
Mold dimensions (8 mm diameter, 2.0 mm thickness)
Incubation time (24 hours)
Incubation temperature (37 °C)
Sterility (UV light exposure for 30 minutes)
controls
Positive control: Not mentioned
Negative control: Not mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required