In all cases a sample field of 136 × 105 × 3 μm (42,840 μm3) was photographed with a 63× objective (1.4 NA) and a CCD camera (Orca ER; Hamamatsu Photonics, Bridgewater, NJ). For LTP experiments, the sample field was placed between the two stimulating electrodes. For analysis of whole brain, sections through mid-septotemporal hippocampus were similarly evaluated. In all instances, digital Z-stacks (0.2 μm steps; 3 μm thick) were collected and processed for iterative deconvolution (Volocity 4.1 Restorative Deconvolution, Improvision, Walthem, MA). Automated in-house systems were then used to count single- or double-labeled puncta within the size range of dendritic spines. Three-dimensional (3D) analyses of spine immunofluorescent labeling in field CA1 str. radiatum were performed using a multiple intensity threshold series protocol as described (Rex et al., 2009 (link); Chen et al., 2010 (link); see
Quantitative Analysis of Dendritic Spine Proteins
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of California, Irvine
Other organizations : Institute of Neurobiology
Protocol cited in 7 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Theta burst stimulation (TBS) of hippocampal slices
- Dendritic spine levels of GTP-bound (activated) Rac1
- Dendritic spine levels of phosphorylated (p) PAK (Ser141)
- Basal levels of PAK3
- Paired control hippocampal slices from the same mice
- Adult mouse brain tissue sections
- Positive control: Cofilin as a spine marker
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!