To ensure scans used for further evaluation of the visual read method were consistent with the gold standard scans used to develop the method, for the 131‐scan and full database sets, image frames of similar post‐injection start time and duration were selected from each acquisition protocol (detail in
Quantitative PET Imaging Protocol Validation
To ensure scans used for further evaluation of the visual read method were consistent with the gold standard scans used to develop the method, for the 131‐scan and full database sets, image frames of similar post‐injection start time and duration were selected from each acquisition protocol (detail in
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Austin Health, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Columbia University, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, KU Leuven, McKing Consulting (United States), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, United States Military Academy, University of Pittsburgh, University Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco
Variable analysis
- Motion-correction and averaging of 4 or 6 successive 5-minute frames beginning at 80 or 90 minutes post-tracer injection
- Partial volume correction (Müller-Gärtner method)
- Regional mean SUVRs for medial temporal, lateral temporal, medial parietal, and lateral parietal regions
- SummedSUVR (summation of each scan's four regional mean SUVRs)
- Inferior cerebellar gray matter as the reference region for SUVR calculation
- Consistency of image frames used for further evaluation with the gold standard scans used to develop the method (similar post-injection start time and duration)
- Motion-correction and averaging of frames
- Co-registration of PET images with respective MRI scans in a common orientation and voxel size without spatial warping
- Providing scans in unsmoothed form and a 4 mm smoothed version for optional comparison
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!