We performed univariate analyses using chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test, and Kruskall Wallis test, as appropriate. All P-values were two-tailed, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate independent predictors of longer LOS (≥3 days; defined using the median value of 2 days) and other measures of severity: ICU admission and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/intubation. Factors were selected for inclusion in the model if they were found to be associated with the outcome in unadjusted analyses (P<0.20) or were potentially clinically significant. All regression models account for potential clustering by site. To further investigate independent predictors of LOS, a zero-truncated negative binomial model was also used to evaluate the relationship between demographic and clinical factors and LOS in days (continuous outcome). Children who were hospitalized for <1 day were assigned 0.5 days LOS. Results of the zero-truncated negative binomial model are reported as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95%CIs.
Viral Bronchiolitis Severity and Outcomes
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Protocol cited in 16 other protocols
Variable analysis
- RSV/HRV status (1) RSV only infection, (2) HRV only infection, (3) RSV in combination with HRV, (4) RSV in combination with non-HRV pathogens, and (5) HRV in combination with non-RSV pathogens
- Length of hospital stay (LOS)
- ICU admission
- Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/intubation
- Potentially clinically significant factors
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!