The remaining infants were divided based on whether or not testing for enterovirus was performed in the CSF by polymerase chain reaction and, if performed, whether the test result was positive or negative. Details of our approach to enterovirus PCR testing have been published previously.39 (link) As viral meningitis can cause CSF pleocytosis, patients with a positive CSF enterovirus PCR were excluded from the reference group.40 (link), 41 (link) While previous studies have examined preterm infants separately from term infants, CSF WBC counts are influenced by postnatal rather than postgestational age.42 (link) Our primary analysis, therefore, combined preterm and term infants into a single group.
Defining Reference CSF WBC Counts in Infants
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Office of Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics and Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania
Protocol cited in 12 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Infants less than or equal to 56 days of age
- Whether the infant underwent lumbar puncture performed as part of their emergency department evaluation
- Presence of traumatic lumbar puncture
- Presence of conditions known or suspected to cause CSF pleocytosis
- Presence of serious bacterial illness
- Results of CSF enterovirus PCR testing
- Time period: January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2007
- Study location: At the authors' institution
- Infants routinely undergo lumbar puncture when presenting with fever at the authors' institution
- Not specified
- Not specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!