Genomic Analysis of Pediatric and Adult AML
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Fred Hutch Cancer Center
Other organizations : University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital, Brigham Young University, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, DuPont (United States), Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's Mercy Hospital
Protocol cited in 33 other protocols
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Presenting hematological indices
- Cytogenetic classification
- KIT mutations
- RAS gene mutations
- NPM mutations
- WT1 mutations
- CEBPA mutations
- IDH1 mutations
- FLT3-ITD allelic ratios
- Samples obtained from COG institutions after written consent from parents/guardians
- Study overseen by Institutional Review Board at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (protocol 1642, IR file no. 5236)
- Exclusion of French-American-British (FAB) system M3 morphology (n = 20) and BCR-ABL1 gene fusion (n = 3) cases from the TCGA cohort
- DNA and RNA extracted from Ficoll-enriched, viably cryopreserved samples from the COG biorepository using the AllPrep Extraction Kit (Qiagen)
- RNA sample quality and integrity tested using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies)
- DNA sample integrity confirmed by visualization on a 0.8% agarose gel
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!