To quantify the axonal degeneration, we measured the area occupied by axons (total axon area) and by degenerated axons at various times after injury. The phase-contrast images were binarized such that pixel intensity of regions corresponding to axons were converted to black and all other regions were converted to white. The total number of black pixels was then defined as the total axon area. Healthy intact axons show a continuous tract, whereas degenerated axons have a particulate structure due to axonal fragmentation or beading. To detect degenerated axons, we used the particle analyzer module of ImageJ and counted the area of the small fragments or particles (size = 20–10,000 pixels) derived from the degenerated axons. A degeneration index (DI) was calculated as the ratio of fragmented axon area over total axon area. The production of the binary images and the function of the particle analysis as well as the accuracy of the DI in detecting axonal degeneration were optimized using multiple images of intact versus degenerating axons obtained from a large number of experiments using our DRG in vitro axotomy system.
Quantifying Axonal Degeneration in DRG Cultures
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Neurology, Inc
Other organizations : University of Rochester
Protocol cited in 31 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Time after injury
- Total axon area
- Degenerated axon area
- Degeneration index (DI)
- Neuronal cell body cluster
- Exposure time (20 ms)
- Objective lens (20×)
- Microscope (Eclipse TE 300; Nikon)
- Camera (Cool SNAP ES; Nikon)
- Image analysis software (MetaMorph, Molecular Devices)
- Image processing (Adobe Photoshop)
- Positive control: Intact axons
- Negative control: Degenerating axons
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!