Denoised 454-pyrosequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a level of 97% sequence identity (AmpliconNoise, v1.29; Quince et al., 2011 (link)) and classified based on the RDP naive Bayesian rRNA Classifier (RDP Classifier, v2.6; Wang et al., 2007 (link)). Representative sequences were aligned based on the SILVA alignment (release 102; Quast et al., 2013 (link)) using mothur (v1.33.2; Schloss et al., 2009 (link)). Finally, pyrosequences that could neither be aligned nor assigned, or were assigned as Archaea or Eukaryota (for example, chloroplasts) were further removed. The 454-pyrosequencing reads of both experimental (Ba, GW, HL, and VA) and environmental (EnvBa, EnvGW, EnvHL, and EnvVA) samples have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRP021096.
Denoising and Taxonomic Classification of 454-Pyrosequencing Data
Denoised 454-pyrosequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a level of 97% sequence identity (AmpliconNoise, v1.29; Quince et al., 2011 (link)) and classified based on the RDP naive Bayesian rRNA Classifier (RDP Classifier, v2.6; Wang et al., 2007 (link)). Representative sequences were aligned based on the SILVA alignment (release 102; Quast et al., 2013 (link)) using mothur (v1.33.2; Schloss et al., 2009 (link)). Finally, pyrosequences that could neither be aligned nor assigned, or were assigned as Archaea or Eukaryota (for example, chloroplasts) were further removed. The 454-pyrosequencing reads of both experimental (Ba, GW, HL, and VA) and environmental (EnvBa, EnvGW, EnvHL, and EnvVA) samples have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRP021096.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Lund University, Science for Life Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark, Uppsala University, University of Copenhagen, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Protocol cited in 21 other protocols
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- None explicitly mentioned
- None explicitly mentioned
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!