This study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb, which provided the study drug and worked jointly with the senior academic authors to design, collect, analyze, and interpret the study results. All the authors signed a confidentiality agreement with the sponsor. The protocol, including a detailed statistical analysis plan, is available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org. All drafts of the manuscript were prepared by the authors with editorial assistance from a professional medical writer paid by the sponsor. All the authors vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the reported data and for the fidelity of this report to the trial protocol, and all the authors made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This phase 1 study assessed the safety, anti-tumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of BMS-936558, a fully human IgG4-blocking monoclonal antibody directed against PD-1, in patients with selected advanced solid tumors. All patients (or their legal representatives) gave written informed consent before enrollment. The antibody was administered as an intravenous infusion every 2 weeks of each 8-week treatment cycle. Response was assessed after each treatment cycle. Patients received treatment for up to 2 years (12 cycles), unless they had a complete response, unacceptable adverse effects, or progressive disease or they withdrew consent. In clinically stable patients, study treatment could be continued beyond apparent initial disease progression until progression was confirmed, as outlined by proposed immune-response criteria.15 (link) Patients with stable disease or an ongoing objective response (complete or partial response) at the end of treatment were followed for up to 1 year and were offered retreatment for 1 additional year in the event of disease progression. Safety evaluations (clinical examination and laboratory assessments) were conducted for all treated patients at baseline and regular intervals. The severity of adverse events was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.16
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Other organizations :
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, Hadassah Medical Center, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Oncology Hematology Care, Sarah Cannon, Tennessee Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)
Administration of BMS-936558, a fully human IgG4-blocking monoclonal antibody directed against PD-1
dependent variables
Safety
Anti-tumor activity
Pharmacokinetics
control variables
Patients with selected advanced solid tumors
Intravenous infusion every 2 weeks of each 8-week treatment cycle
Treatment for up to 2 years (12 cycles), unless they had a complete response, unacceptable adverse effects, or progressive disease or they withdrew consent
Safety evaluations (clinical examination and laboratory assessments) at baseline and regular intervals
Severity of adverse events graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required