Ex vivo μCT images of the digits were obtained using a Bruker SkyScan 1,172 scanner (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium) at a pixel size of 4 µm with 0.2 rotation angle and five frame averaging using a custom 0.25 mm aluminum filter. The X-ray source used was 50 kV, 201 μA, and 10 W, as described previously (Tower et al., 2022 (link)). All samples were reconstructed using NRecon with smoothing correction disabled, a beam hardening correction of 24%, and a dynamic range of 0.00–0.339. Reconstructed digits were exported as 8-bit BMP output files, rotated transaxially in DataViewer, and binarized and 3D analyzed in CTAn. Global thresholds were used for all young mice (8-week old) data sets with minimum threshold value set to 0 and maximum threshold value of 67 and a global threshold for aged mice (18-month old) data sets with minimum threshold value set to 0 and maximum threshold value of 79. For analysis of hypomineralized tissue at day 14 we used CTAn (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium, RRID:
Ex vivo µCT Analysis of Digit Regeneration
Ex vivo μCT images of the digits were obtained using a Bruker SkyScan 1,172 scanner (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium) at a pixel size of 4 µm with 0.2 rotation angle and five frame averaging using a custom 0.25 mm aluminum filter. The X-ray source used was 50 kV, 201 μA, and 10 W, as described previously (Tower et al., 2022 (link)). All samples were reconstructed using NRecon with smoothing correction disabled, a beam hardening correction of 24%, and a dynamic range of 0.00–0.339. Reconstructed digits were exported as 8-bit BMP output files, rotated transaxially in DataViewer, and binarized and 3D analyzed in CTAn. Global thresholds were used for all young mice (8-week old) data sets with minimum threshold value set to 0 and maximum threshold value of 67 and a global threshold for aged mice (18-month old) data sets with minimum threshold value set to 0 and maximum threshold value of 79. For analysis of hypomineralized tissue at day 14 we used CTAn (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium, RRID:
Variable analysis
- Treatment (control vs. OAA)
- Volume of hypomineralized tissue
- Taper of digit morphology
- Bone mineral density (BMD)
- Pixel size (4 μm)
- Rotation angle (0.2 degrees)
- Frame averaging (5)
- X-ray source settings (50 kV, 201 μA, 10 W)
- Reconstruction parameters (smoothing correction disabled, beam hardening correction of 24%, dynamic range of 0.00–0.339)
- Global thresholds for young (8-week old) and aged (18-month old) mice
- Positive control: Mineralized areas above the global threshold for bone (35-67 grayscale values) in the digit
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!