All interviews were conducted by a female investigator (JM) who had a background in Physiotherapy and creative arts and was trained to conduct the interviews by an experienced qualitative researcher. A second investigator attended the interviews to take field notes about interactions between interviewer and interviewee and the physical environment. The second investigator was either a social worker with expertise in qualitative research and chronic pain (MN) or a physiotherapist trained in qualitative methodology (MS). There were no prior relationships between the interviewers and any of the interviewees and participants were not financially compensated for their participation. The a priori developed semi-structured interview guide was followed. The focus group and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim by the researcher who conducted the interviews. Recruitment, data collection and analysis proceeded concurrently until data saturation was reached (i.e., when no new consistent themes were emerging) (22 ). Participants did not comment on transcripts or initial findings.
Qualitative Exploration of Persistent Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors
All interviews were conducted by a female investigator (JM) who had a background in Physiotherapy and creative arts and was trained to conduct the interviews by an experienced qualitative researcher. A second investigator attended the interviews to take field notes about interactions between interviewer and interviewee and the physical environment. The second investigator was either a social worker with expertise in qualitative research and chronic pain (MN) or a physiotherapist trained in qualitative methodology (MS). There were no prior relationships between the interviewers and any of the interviewees and participants were not financially compensated for their participation. The a priori developed semi-structured interview guide was followed. The focus group and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim by the researcher who conducted the interviews. Recruitment, data collection and analysis proceeded concurrently until data saturation was reached (i.e., when no new consistent themes were emerging) (22 ). Participants did not comment on transcripts or initial findings.
Corresponding Organization : University of Queensland
Other organizations : Griffith University, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Variable analysis
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Researchers and clinicians with experience and expertise in persistent pain, pain management, cancer survivorship and qualitative study methods
- Participants were invited through emailing members of the Breast Cancer Network Australia Review and Survey Group, and via advertisement on social media platforms, newsletters and posters
- Interviews were conducted by a female investigator (JM) who had a background in Physiotherapy and creative arts and was trained to conduct the interviews by an experienced qualitative researcher
- A second investigator attended the interviews to take field notes about interactions between interviewer and interviewee and the physical environment
- The second investigator was either a social worker with expertise in qualitative research and chronic pain (MN) or a physiotherapist trained in qualitative methodology (MS)
- There were no prior relationships between the interviewers and any of the interviewees
- Participants were not financially compensated for their participation
- The a priori developed semi-structured interview guide was followed
- Recruitment, data collection and analysis proceeded concurrently until data saturation was reached
- Not mentioned
- Not mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!