Protocol detail

Virtual OSCE Design and Implementation

Find Similar Protocols

This research study was undertaken by five UCLMS students, four of whom were in Year 5 and one in their Integrated Bachelor of Science (BSc) year. Overseen by a Clinical Associate Lecturer at UCLMS, they were responsible for gaining ethical approval, recruitment, the OSCE design and set up, data collection and analysis. Ethical approval for this study was gained from the UCL Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 20567/001). Consent for participation was gained from all participants, and all responses were anonymised. The research study was awarded a £500 grant from the Student Quality Improvement and Development fund (SQUID) at UCLMS. This was evenly distributed among the students/doctors acting as OSCE examiners for the virtual mock sessions.

Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link: Access Free Full Text.

Lim G.H., Gera R.D., Hany Kamel F., Thirupathirajan V.A., Albani S, & Chakrabarti R. (2023). “We Need More Practice”: Evaluating the Role of Virtual Mock OSCES in the Undergraduate Programme During the COVID Pandemic. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 14, 157-166.

Publication 2023

Doctors Research ethics committee Squid Students

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

OSCE design and set up

dependent variables

Data collection and analysis

control variables

Ethical approval
Consent for participation
Anonymization of responses

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!