Autogenous vs. Allogenic Bone Grafts for Implant Placement

The present pilot study was conducted from January 2020 to June 2021 at the outpatient Department of Periodontology, of our institute in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013 and was registered at Clinical Trial Registry of India. A written informed consent was obtained from all the participating patients. The study was also approved by Institutional Ethics Committee.
A total of 20 patients in the age range of 20–50 years were enrolled for the study and were fully informed about the surgical procedure and treatment alternatives. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using simple randomization method by computer-generated numbers to reduce potential bias involved.

Group I – Patients treated using autogenous bone block graft (n = 10)

Group II –Patients treated using allogenic DFDBA bone block graft (n = 10).

The inclusion criterion mandated systemically healthy patients requiring dental implant placement, presence of a clinically relevant bone atrophy of the alveolar ridge in the predominantly horizontal and/or vertical plane as identified by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The minimum defect size of ≤3 mm at crestal and middle sites of bucco-palatal dimension of residual alveolar ridge, edentulous space of a single tooth missing in the maxillary anterior region were included. The exclusion criteria consisted of a history of radiotherapy in the head and neck region, existing severe periodontal disease, bruxism, smoking habit or alcoholism, pregnancy, psychiatric problems, and/or use of medications known to alter bone healing.
After screening, radiographic examination including CBCT analysis was carried out before undergoing the surgical procedure. The patients underwent a thorough initial periodontal examination including the plaque index, gingival index, and probing depth. The preoperative CBCT measurements are as follows:
The alveolar bone levels were measured in their height, width, and depth at the cervical, middle, and apical level taking adjacent teeth as reference [Figure 1].

Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link: Access Free Full Text.

Bawankar P.V., Kolte A.P, & Kolte R.A. (2023). Patient-centered outcome measures comparing the autogenous and allogenic bone blocks in the augmentation of deficient alveolar ridges: A pilot study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 27(1), 87-94.

Publication 2023

Alcoholism Alveolar bone atrophy Alveolar ridge Bone Bone graft Bruxism Cervical Cone beam computed tomography Dental implant Gingival index Graft Head Institutional ethics committee Maxillary Medications Missing tooth Outpatient Patients Periodontal Periodontal disease Pregnancy Radiographic Radiotherapy Surgical procedure Teeth

Corresponding Organization : ACPM Dental College and Hospital

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Type of bone graft used for alveolar ridge augmentation: autogenous bone block graft (Group I) or allogenic DFDBA bone block graft (Group II)

dependent variables

Alveolar bone levels measured in height, width, and depth at the cervical, middle, and apical level

control variables

Systemically healthy patients requiring dental implant placement
Presence of a clinically relevant bone atrophy of the alveolar ridge in the predominantly horizontal and/or vertical plane as identified by CBCT
Minimum defect size of ≤3 mm at crestal and middle sites of bucco-palatal dimension of residual alveolar ridge
Edentulous space of a single tooth missing in the maxillary anterior region
No history of radiotherapy in the head and neck region
No existing severe periodontal disease
No bruxism, smoking habit, or alcoholism
No pregnancy, psychiatric problems, or use of medications known to alter bone healing

controls

Positive control: Not specified
Negative control: Not specified

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!