From the fluorescence profiles, we calculated the unfolded fraction (fU) for the 48-h data using the following equation.
Here, yO is the observed fluorescence at GdnHCl concentration [D], whereas yF, mF, yU, and mU are intercepts and slopes of the pre- and post-transition baselines, respectively.
We were able to explain the folding transitions for most of the mutants using the two-state equation (42 (link)).
This equation assumes that the protein folds in a cooperative manner from the unfolded (U) to the folded (F) state, without a detectable folding intermediate. We obtained the thermodynamic parameters ΔG0 (ΔGF0,H2O, folding free energy) and m value (change in ASA between U and F states) of folding from the fits. The midpoint of chemical denaturation (Cm) was calculated as Cm = ΔG/m.
The folding transition of some mutants could only be explained using a three-state equation (
Here, we obtained ΔG1 and ΔG2 and their corresponding m1 and m2 values for the change in free energy from the first (U → I) and second (I → N) transitions, respectively.
The PagP samples for folding in DLPC were prepared as described above. We used the same parameters for data acquisition in DLPC samples as for DPC. From the fluorescence profiles, we calculated the unfolded fraction (fU) for the 48-h data using