The LVEDV (determined by echocardiography) and PCWP data were used to construct LV end-diastolic pressure-volume curves using the following exponential model, which has been described previously5 (link): P=P∞ (expa(V–V0)−1) where P is PCWP; P∞, pressure asymptote of the curve; V, LVEDV index; V0, equilibrium volume or the volume at which P=0 mm Hg, and a is a constant that characterizes the chamber stiffness. LV end-diastolic transmural pressure-volume curves also were constructed using estimated transmural pressure (PCWP–right atrial pressure).18 (link) The PCWP and stroke volume (SV) data obtained by the acetelyene rebreathing method were used to construct Frank-Starling curves. The LVEDV, SV, and mean atrial pressure data were used to construct preload recruitable stroke work(PRSW) relationships. Circumferential LV wall stress (σc) and strain were determined as previously described5 (link) by use of the modified Laplace relation: σc=Pb/h[1–(h/2b)][1–(hb/2a2)], where P is estimated transmural pressure; h, LV midwall thickness; a, major semiaxis; and b, minor semiaxis. The LV midwall thickness and semiaxis measurements were calculated from the transthoracic echocardiographic images. Ventricular strain was calculated as follows: strain=(V–Vmin)/Vmin, where the smallest end-diastolic volume measured during cardiac unloading (Vmin) was determined. This value was subtracted from the end-diastolic volume at each loading and unloading condition (V–Vmin). The resulting data were used to construct stress-strain plots, which were modeled by an exponential equation (y=aebx). Total arterial compliance was estimated by the ratio between the acetylene rebreathing-derived SV and pulse pressure.19 (link) Effective arterial elastance was estimated as the LV end-systolic pressure divided by SV, where LV end-systolic pressure was estimated as 0.9×systolic blood pressure.20 (link),21 (link)