Auditory Perception Experiment with Pure Tones

Table 1 shows the types of stimuli used in this study. Participants were seated approximately 1.1 m in front of a computer screen in a dimly lit, soundproofed, and electrically shielded room. Following the procedure used by Gong et al. (2013) (link), four pure tone stimuli (1,000 Hz vs. 2,000 Hz; 55 dB vs. 59 dB) were created using Adobe Audition 3.0 and verified using Praat. Pure tones with a duration of 375 ms were binaurally presented via Sennheiser headphones. The sound pressure level was monitored through a digital sound level meter.

Free full text: Click here

Xie J., Cui R., Ma W., Lu J., Wang L., Ying S., Yao D., Gong D., Yan G, & Liu T. (2022). Information transmission in action video gaming experts: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 906123.

Publication 2022

Audition 3.0 Praat

Electrically Pressure Sound

Corresponding Organization : University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Other organizations : University of Arkansas at Fayetteville

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Tone frequency (1,000 Hz vs. 2,000 Hz)
Tone intensity (55 dB vs. 59 dB)

dependent variables

Unspecified

control variables

Participant seating distance (approximately 1.1 m in front of a computer screen)
Environment (dimly lit, soundproofed, and electrically shielded room)
Tone duration (375 ms)
Tone presentation (binaurally via Sennheiser headphones)
Sound pressure level monitoring (using a digital sound level meter)

controls

Positive control: None specified
Negative control: None specified

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!