Avelumab was administered at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 2 weeks. An antihistamine and acetaminophen were administered approximately 30 to 60 minutes before each infusion. Axitinib was administered orally at a starting dose of 5 mg twice daily on a continuous dosing schedule. Sunitinib was administered at a dose of 50 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle. Dose escalations and reductions of axitinib and dose reductions of sunitinib are described in the protocol (available at NEJM. org).17 ,18 Dose reductions of avelumab were not permitted, but subsequent infusions could be omitted in response to persisting toxic effects. The original primary objective was to show the superiority of avelumab plus axitinib over sunitinib in prolonging progression-free survival among patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. A June 2017 protocol amendment, while data were still masked, was based on new data from a single-group phase 1b trial14 (link) and two trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors that showed an overall survival benefit among patients with renal-cell carcinoma.5 (link),6 (link) This amendment changed the primary objective of the trial to show the superiority of avelumab plus axitinib over sunitinib with respect to either progression-free or overall survival among patients with PD-L1–positive tumors.
Avelumab plus Axitinib vs. Sunitinib in Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Euromedic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Institut Gustave Roussy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, BC Cancer Agency, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Osaka University Hospital, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan College, Russian Railways, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Macquarie University, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, University of Tübingen, Pfizer (United States), Pfizer (Italy), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Protocol cited in 16 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Avelumab plus axitinib
- Sunitinib
- Progression-free survival
- Overall survival
- ECOG performance-status score (0 vs. 1)
- Geographic region (United States vs. Canada and Western Europe vs. the rest of the world)
- Positive control: Sunitinib
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!