Evans blue (EB) was used as an indicator to show the location and extent of BBB opening in rat brains since EB cannot penetrate an intact BBB. Immediately after the injection of 0.5 ml of 3% EB via the rats’ tail vein, 100 shockwave iterations were applied (intensity level 5, pulse repetition frequency (PRF) 5 Hz, N = 8). The following process was modified from a previous study27 (link). The original two hour interval time for euthanization was extended to three hours. Three hours after the shockwave application, the rats were sacrificed and the brains were harvested for histological analysis27 (link). The intensity levels for each parameter are shown in Table 1.
Major shockwave parameters of the intensity levels.
Intensity level
0.1
1
2
3
4
5
10
20
Negative peak pressure (MPa)
−4.2
−7.3
−7.92
−8.54
−9.17
−9.79
−12.9
−18.7
Positive peak pressure (MPa)
5.4
11.8
13.66
15.51
17.37
19.22
28.5
77.7
Energy flux density (Total) (mJ/mm2)
0.03
0.1
0.13
0.16
0.18
0.21
0.35
0.82
To evaluate the performance of shockwave applications, the successful (visible) BBB opening rate is defined as number of rats with BBB opening after shockwave treatment over the total number of rats receiving shockwave treatment. To define BBB opening, the Evans blue stained area of the histology sections were further analyzed using a color histogram of Image J. The delta blue and delta red in the proposed study were the differences in pixels of blue and red color in RGB-image system that were used to evaluate the staining level of Evans blue and the red blood cell extravasation level between the shockwave applied side and untreated side. Both of them were assessed using student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis, wherein p < 0.05 for the delta blue between the shockwave applied side and untreated side. To confirm the reversibility of the shockwave-induced BBB opening, 0.5 ml of 3% EB was injected via the rats’ tail vein 24 hrs after applying 100 shockwave iterations with all other conditions remaining constant (N = 5). The rats were then sacrificed for brain sectioning 3 hours after the EB injection. Traditionally, ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) is used together with HIFU to induce BBB opening in the brain by enhancing cavitation28 (link),29 (link). The effect of UCA on shockwaves was investigated by adding various concentrations of SonoVue UCA from 2.5 × 102 to 2.5 × 108 microbubbles/kg body weight (the clinical concentration is 3–15 × 106 microbubbles/kg) through the tail vein immediately before shockwave treatment (N = 5).
Other organizations :
National Taiwan University Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, National Taipei University, Chang Gung University, Centre Léon Bérard, Laboratoire des applications Thérapeutiques des Ultrasons, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm
Presence of ultrasound contrast agent (SonoVue) at various concentrations (2.5 × 10^2 to 2.5 × 10^8 microbubbles/kg body weight)
dependent variables
Successful (visible) BBB opening rate
Delta blue (difference in pixels of blue color in RGB-image system between shockwave applied side and untreated side)
Delta red (difference in pixels of red color in RGB-image system between shockwave applied side and untreated side)
control variables
Evans blue (EB) injection dose (0.5 ml of 3% EB)
Number of shockwave iterations (100)
Pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of shockwaves (5 Hz)
Time between EB injection and euthanasia (3 hours)
Rat as the experimental model
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required