At WFBMC and DMC, participants were accrued into the pre-implementation cohort (November 2013-October 2014) or the post-implementation cohort (February 2015-January 2016). A wash-in period (November 2014- January 2015) was used to train providers and beta-test an electronic health record (EHR)-based HEART Pathway clinical decision support tool. LMC accrued patients into the pre-implementation (January-July 2015) and post-implementation cohorts (August 2015- January 2016), with a 1-month wash-in period. Patients were accrued into each cohort based on the date of their initial ED visit; later visits for chest pain were considered recurrent care. To prevent accruing more ED repeat users/high utilizers (who often have more co-morbid conditions) into the pre-implementation cohort, patients with an ED visit for possible ACS at each site in the year before the study began (N=523) were excluded from analysis. Patients transferred within the network or visiting multiple sites were classified based on their original ED visit. For transfers, care at the receiving hospital was considered part of their index encounter.
Evaluating Clinical Decision Support for ACS
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Wake Forest University
Protocol cited in 8 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Implementation of HEART Pathway clinical decision support tool
- Outcomes for adult ED patients (≥21 years old) investigated for possible ACS, but without evidence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on electrocardiography (ECG)
- Inclusion criteria for patients (chief complaint of chest pain and at least one troponin ordered, without evidence of a STEMI on ECG, including patients with known coronary artery disease)
- Exclusion of patients with an ED visit for possible ACS at each site in the year before the study began (N=523) to prevent accruing more ED repeat users/high utilizers
- Patients transferred within the network or visiting multiple sites were classified based on their original ED visit, and care at the receiving hospital was considered part of their index encounter
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!