Refining PVS1 Criterion for Variant Interpretation
In July 2017, the SVI Working Group, representing clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, genomic researchers, and clinical laboratory geneticists, held a two-day in-person meeting in Boston, MA to specifically refine and extend several ACMG/AMP criteria including the PVS1 criterion. During this meeting, the group outlined a detailed framework for evolving the previous PVS1 criterion into the current recommendations in this report. Subsequently, a smaller group within the ClinGen Hearing Loss (HL) Working Group continued further refinement of this rule through weekly conference calls and solicited feedback from the SVI Working group via monthly conference calls. In October 2017, the SVI Working Group held a second in-person meeting at the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) meeting in Orlando, FL. During that meeting, the group finalized a first recommendation draft and provided comments for additional refinements that were addressed through the HL group and later approved by the SVI Working Group. Throughout the PVS1 criterion refinement process, we used expert opinions, empirical data in the literature, and unpublished observations from participating research and clinical laboratories. In addition, to ensure comprehensive utility of the new rule, seven ClinGen Clinical Domain Working Groups (CDWGs) were asked to use this rule to classify five to ten LoF variants each in their genes of interest (total 56 variants in ten genes). Their feedback was then incorporated into the final PVS1 recommendations.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Abou Tayoun A.N., Pesaran T., DiStefano M.T., Oza A., Rehm H.L., Biesecker L.G, & Harrison S.M. (2018). Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion. Human mutation, 39(11), 1517-1524.
Publication 2018
Clinical laboratories ConferenceCounselorsGenes Genes variants Genetic Genomic Hearing loss Held
Corresponding Organization : University of Pennsylvania
Other organizations :
Ambry Genetics (United States), Mass General Brigham, Massachusetts General Hospital, Broad Institute, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health
No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the input text.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required