Patients were randomised if they met the following main inclusion criteria: outpatients aged ≥40 years with a history of moderate to very severe COPD (GOLD stage 2–4) [23 ]; post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% of predicted normal; post-bronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <70%; current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of >10 pack–years. Patients with a significant disease other than COPD were excluded from the trials. Other exclusion criteria included: clinically relevant abnormal baseline laboratory parameters or a history of asthma; myocardial infarction within 1 year of screening; unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia; known active tuberculosis; clinically evident bronchiectasis; cystic fibrosis or life-threatening pulmonary obstruction; hospitalised for heart failure within the past year; diagnosed thyrotoxicosis or paroxysmal tachycardia; previous thoracotomy with pulmonary resection; regular use of daytime oxygen if patients were unable to abstain during clinic visits; or currently enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation programme (or completed in the 6 weeks before screening). Patients with moderate or severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance ≤50 mL·min−1) were not excluded from the study but were closely monitored by the investigator. Both studies were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, International Conference on Harmonisation Harmonised Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice and local regulations. The protocols were approved by the authorities and the ethics committees of the respective institutions, and signed informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Buhl R., Maltais F., Abrahams R., Bjermer L., Derom E., Ferguson G., Fležar M., Hébert J., McGarvey L., Pizzichini E., Reid J., Veale A., Grönke L., Hamilton A., Korducki L., Tetzlaff K., Waitere-Wijker S., Watz H, & Bateman E. (2015). Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2–4). The European Respiratory Journal, 45(4), 969-979.
Other organizations :
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Pulmonary Associates, Lund University, Ghent University Hospital, University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Centre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec, Queen's University Belfast, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, University of Otago, University of Adelaide, Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany), Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada), Boehringer Ingelheim (United States), University of Tübingen, German Center for Lung Research, University of Cape Town
COPD severity (moderate to very severe, GOLD stage 2–4)
Smoking history (>10 pack-years)
dependent variables
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 (<80% of predicted normal)
Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC (<70%)
control variables
Absence of significant disease other than COPD
No clinically relevant abnormal baseline laboratory parameters
No history of asthma
No myocardial infarction within 1 year of screening
No unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia
No active tuberculosis
No clinically evident bronchiectasis
No cystic fibrosis or life-threatening pulmonary obstruction
No hospitalization for heart failure within the past year
No diagnosed thyrotoxicosis or paroxysmal tachycardia
No previous thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
No regular use of daytime oxygen (unless able to abstain during clinic visits)
No participation in a pulmonary rehabilitation program (within 6 weeks before screening)
Moderate or severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance ≤50 mL·min^-1) (closely monitored)
controls
Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned.
Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required