Subjects were recruited from the Outpatient Department of the Rural Eye Hospital, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai. One hundred consecutive patients who could read English alphabets and who had unaided visual acuity better than or equal to 6/60 so as to exclude people with severe visual impairment. Consecutive patients visiting the optometrist room, which was standardized for testing and who met the required criteria were included in the study. After obtaining oral consent from the subjects, unaided visual acuity was tested by a trained optometrist using both the newly constructed Pocket Vision Screener and logMAR visual acuity chart. All visual acuity testing was performed by a single examiner. For each subject, right eye was chosen as the testing eye and the other eye was occluded. The chart to be read first was chosen randomly. The randomization was done using the pseudo-random number generator in Microsoft Excel. Subjects were seated at a distance of 3 m from the chart. In the case of visual acuity measurement using the logMAR chart, the subjects were instructed to read from the top left and stop reading until they were not able to read anymore letters. Every correctly read letter was assigned a score of 0.02 and every incorrectly read or unread letter was assigned a score of 0.00. Visual acuity (logMAR) for each subject was determined using the formula: VA (logMAR) =1.1–0.02 × number of correctly read letters In the case of the Pocket Vision Screener, the subjects were instructed to read all the letters in the middle line. Correct response of any three letters out of the middle five in the middle line was considered to have passed the screening as more than 50% of the letters were rightly identified. The time taken to measure visual acuity was recorded using a stopwatch for both the logMAR chart and Pocket Vision Screener. Data analysis was done using Microsoft Office Excel 2003 (Microsoft) and SPSS version 12.0 (SPSS Inc.).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Raja M., Ramamurthy D., Srinivasan K, & Varadharajan L.S. (2014). Development of Pocket Vision Screener and its effectiveness at screening visual acuity deficits. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 62(12), 1152-1155.
Subjects had unaided visual acuity better than or equal to 6/60 to exclude severe visual impairment
Testing was performed in a standardized optometrist room
Visual acuity testing was performed by a single examiner
Right eye was chosen as the testing eye and the other eye was occluded
The chart to be read first was chosen randomly using a pseudo-random number generator
controls
Positive control: None mentioned
Negative control: None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required