Optimized Peritoneal Adhesion Model
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Protocol cited in 3 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Cecum abrasion to create peritoneal injuries
- Suture fixation of cecum to abdominal wall
- Formation of peritoneal adhesions
- Dose of Ketamine and Xylazine for general anesthesia
- Preparation of abdominal area with alcohol and iodine
- Laparotomy procedure
- Cecum handling and abrasion technique
- Suture material and technique
- Positive control: OPAM group (n = 10) - cecum abrasion and suture fixation
- Negative control: WSFX group (n = 4) - cecum abrasion without suture fixation
- Sham control: Sham-OPAM group (n = 5) - suture fixation without peritoneal injuries
- Sham control: Sham-WSFX group (n = 5) - laparotomy without any injuries or suturing
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!