Tissue microarray immunostainings were semi-quantitatively scored by three examiners blinded to the clinical information with an immunoreactive score modified from a previously published one (154 (link)). Immunostaining intensity was graded as follows: 0 = negative, 1 = weak, 2 = intermediate, and 3 = strong. All villi in a random field of each of the three cores were evaluated by all examiners, and scores within each core were averaged to represent the target protein quantity of that core. Thus, each placenta had three scores corresponding to the three cores examined.
Placental Tissue Microarray Analysis
Tissue microarray immunostainings were semi-quantitatively scored by three examiners blinded to the clinical information with an immunoreactive score modified from a previously published one (154 (link)). Immunostaining intensity was graded as follows: 0 = negative, 1 = weak, 2 = intermediate, and 3 = strong. All villi in a random field of each of the three cores were evaluated by all examiners, and scores within each core were averaged to represent the target protein quantity of that core. Thus, each placenta had three scores corresponding to the three cores examined.
Corresponding Organization : Michigan State University
Other organizations : Eötvös Loránd University, Harvard University, Brigham and Women's Hospital, University of Debrecen, HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont, Medical University of Vienna, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, University of Cambridge, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Immunostaining intensity of target proteins in placental tissue samples
- Quantity of target proteins in placental tissue samples
- Tissue microarray construction methodology (e.g., core size, number of cores per sample)
- Tissue processing and embedding (FFPE)
- Sectioning thickness (5 μm)
- Antibodies and reagents used for immunostaining
- Automated staining platforms (Ventana Discovery, Leica BOND-MAX)
- Semi-quantitative scoring method (immunoreactive score)
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Blinding of examiners to clinical information
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!