Parasite culture and ring-stage survival assay. Parasitemia was estimated by microscopy examination on Giemsa-stained blood smears. Venous blood samples were then processed by eliminating plasma, leukocytes and anticoagulant from red blood cells (RBCs), washed twice in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Life technologies). Parasitemia were adjusted to 1% if greater by adding uninfected RBCs as previously described [10 (link)]. Then, 900 μL RBCs were loaded into wells, exposed to either 100 μL of 700 nM DHA or0.1% of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and cultivated at 37°C in incubator for six hours (conditions: 94% N2, 5% CO2, 1% O2) [30 (link)]. Finally, RBCs were washed and cultivated for 66 hours. The proportions of viable parasites were estimated independently by two expert malaria microscopists on Giemsa-stained thin smears. The number of viable parasites that developed into ring/trophozoite stages were determined, pyknotic forms were excluded. The average of the two counts was calculated. If any discrepancy was noted (either difference of parasite density of > 50%), slides were checked by a third independent reader, and parasite densities were calculated by averaging the two most close counts. Survival rates were calculated as the ratio of parasites in exposed and non-exposed cultures. Results were deemed as interpretable if the parasitemia in the sample exposed to DMSO was higher than the initial parasitemia at 0h [31 ].
Ex vivo Ring-stage Survival Assay for Malaria
Parasite culture and ring-stage survival assay. Parasitemia was estimated by microscopy examination on Giemsa-stained blood smears. Venous blood samples were then processed by eliminating plasma, leukocytes and anticoagulant from red blood cells (RBCs), washed twice in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Life technologies). Parasitemia were adjusted to 1% if greater by adding uninfected RBCs as previously described [10 (link)]. Then, 900 μL RBCs were loaded into wells, exposed to either 100 μL of 700 nM DHA or0.1% of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and cultivated at 37°C in incubator for six hours (conditions: 94% N2, 5% CO2, 1% O2) [30 (link)]. Finally, RBCs were washed and cultivated for 66 hours. The proportions of viable parasites were estimated independently by two expert malaria microscopists on Giemsa-stained thin smears. The number of viable parasites that developed into ring/trophozoite stages were determined, pyknotic forms were excluded. The average of the two counts was calculated. If any discrepancy was noted (either difference of parasite density of > 50%), slides were checked by a third independent reader, and parasite densities were calculated by averaging the two most close counts. Survival rates were calculated as the ratio of parasites in exposed and non-exposed cultures. Results were deemed as interpretable if the parasitemia in the sample exposed to DMSO was higher than the initial parasitemia at 0h [31 ].
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Centre de Recherche Médicale et Sanitaire, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Inserm, Université Paris Cité, Institut de Recherche Agronomique de Guinée, Mère et Enfant en Milieu Tropical, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Institut Cochin, Unit of Virus Host Cell Interactions, Université de Strasbourg, Yale University
Variable analysis
- Exposure to 700 nM dihydroartemisinin (DHA)
- Exposure to 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
- Proportion of viable parasites that developed into ring/trophozoite stages
- Survival rates of parasites in exposed and non-exposed cultures
- Parasitemia adjusted to 1% if greater than 1% by adding uninfected red blood cells
- Cultivation conditions (94% N2, 5% CO2, 1% O2) at 37°C for 66 hours
- Positive control: Parasites exposed to 700 nM DHA
- Negative control: Parasites exposed to 0.1% DMSO
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!