Before data collection, patients’ skin over the vastus lateralis was shaved, rubbed with abrasive skin prep, and cleaned with alcohol to improve the electrode–skin contact and minimize skin impedance. Bipolar, disposable, pre-gelled Ag/AgCl surface electrodes with 20 mm distance between electrode centers were placed on the belly of the vastus lateralis. The exact placement of the electrodes followed the recommendations by Surface Electromyography for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM 2008 ). The reference electrode was placed over the proximal end of the fibula of the same leg. Signals were analog filtered at 10–500 Hz (with first order filter at lower cutoff frequency and sixth order filter at higher cutoff frequency), amplified 2000× and sampled at 1 kHz using a TeleMyo 900 telemetric hardware system (Noraxon USA, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, baseline noise < 1 uV RMS, Common Mode Rejection min. 85 dB through 10–500 Hz operating range). EMG signals were recorded as each of 17 subjects performed one near-maximal voluntary isometric contractions, starting with 1 s of rest interval to establish baseline. The raw signals were visually inspected and the pre-contraction portions of the baseline as well as the steady portions of the EMG burst were identified. The baseline and the EMG burst from each recorded signal was then used to construct 17 reference EMG signals by adjoining the baseline and the burst portion at a known onset time t0 (see Fig. 1). Length of the EMG baseline, EMG burst, and position of the true onset t0 varied for all reference signals. The known, true onset times, t0, were used as a reference to quantify the accuracy of estimated onset times t1 identified by three onset detection methods.
Construction of the reference signal. From the raw signal (top panel), a portion of the baseline and a portion of the EMG burst was selected (middle panel) and re-joined at the known onset time t0 (bottom panel). To demonstrate the importance of signal conditioning, the baseline in this example contains fluctuations in the signal amplitude. These fluctuations were not associated with the muscle contraction
The precise EMG onset was not known in the experimental signals recorded from old adults during gait. In these trials, we determined the onset time, t0, by visual detection because computerized techniques should detect EMG onset close to the onset time selected by individuals with EMG expertise (Staude et al. 2001 (link)). SNR of the reference signals was calculated to test the influence of signal quality on onset detection accuracy. The SNR of the signals was defined as: where A is RMS amplitude. All data analysis was performed in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Solnik S., Rider P., Steinweg K., DeVita P, & Hortobágyi T. (2010). Teager–Kaiser energy operator signal conditioning improves EMG onset detection. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 110(3), 489-498.
Accuracy of estimated onset times (t1) compared to true onset times (t0)
control variables
Skin preparation (shaved, rubbed with abrasive skin prep, cleaned with alcohol)
Electrode placement (bipolar, disposable, pre-gelled Ag/AgCl surface electrodes with 20 mm distance between electrode centers, placed on the belly of the vastus lateralis, following SENIAM recommendations)
Reference electrode placement (over the proximal end of the fibula of the same leg)
Signal conditioning (analog filtered at 10–500 Hz, amplified 2000×, sampled at 1 kHz)
Hardware system (TeleMyo 900 telemetric hardware system, Noraxon USA, Inc.)
Baseline noise (< 1 uV RMS)
Common Mode Rejection (min. 85 dB through 10–500 Hz operating range)
EMG recording during near-maximal voluntary isometric contractions
Visual inspection of raw signals to identify pre-contraction baseline and steady portions of the EMG burst
Construction of 17 reference EMG signals by adjoining baseline and burst portion at known onset time (t0)
Variation in length of EMG baseline, EMG burst, and position of the true onset (t0) for all reference signals
positive controls
Known, true onset times (t0) used as a reference to quantify the accuracy of estimated onset times (t1) identified by three onset detection methods
negative controls
Not mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required