Comparison of Grass-Fed and Corn-Fed Beef
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Maryland, College Park, Northwest A&F University, Recombinetics (United States)
Protocol cited in 6 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Feeding regimen: grass-fed vs. conventional diet
- Nutritional composition of meat
- Functional properties of meat
- Genetic background of animals (closed Wye Angus herd with very similar genetics)
- Animal handling and slaughter procedures (same for both groups)
- Time of blood collection and sample processing (similar for both groups)
- Pasture management (no fertilizers, pesticides, or chemical additives)
- Hay/forage production (minimal fertilizer, no pesticides or inorganic chemicals)
- None specified
- Conventional diet group (fed corn silage, soybean, shelled corn and minerals)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!