Comparative Evaluation of JAK2 Assays
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : King's College London, University of Florence, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Vejle Sygehus, Qiagen (France), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Inserm, Nantes Université, Radboud University Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Munich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, University of Ulster, Belfast City Hospital, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Utah, ARUP Laboratories (United States), Queen's University Belfast, Institut Universitaire de France, University of Bergamo
Protocol cited in 13 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Different qPCR assays designed to detect wild-type JAK2 (JAK2-WT) and the JAK2 1849G>T mutation encoding JAK2-V617F (designated JAK2-V617F assay)
- Detection of wild-type JAK2 (JAK2-WT) and the JAK2 1849G>T mutation encoding JAK2-V617F
- Cyclophilin A and Albumin (ALB) assays as independent control gene assays to control for variation in the amount of template DNA between reaction wells and between successive quality control (QC) rounds
- Water controls
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Water controls
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!