Transcriptomic Assembly Comparison: CLC Genomics vs Oyster River
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Plymouth State University
Variable analysis
- Assembly method (CLC Genomics WorkBench vs. Oyster River Protocol)
- Transcriptomic assembly quality (assessed via BUSCO and TransRate)
- Minimum contig length (200 bp)
- Automatic word and bubble sizes (24 and 50, respectively) for CLC Genomics WorkBench assembly
- Default settings for Oyster River Protocol assembly (TPM_FILT = 1, STRAND = RF, MEM = 150, CPU = 24)
- Amazon Web Service EC2 server with 32 vCPUs and 128 GB of RAM for Oyster River Protocol assembly
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!